Re: lock violation in unionfs (9.0-STABLE r230270)
2012/2/13, Pavel Polyakov <bsd@kobyla.org>:
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=165087
>
> Occurs simply trying to use unionfs:
> mount -t unionfs -o noatime /usr /mnt
>
> insmntque: mp-safe fs and non-locked vp: 0xfffffe01d96704f0 is not
> exclusive locked but should be
> KDB: enter: lock violation
Pavel,
can you give a spin to this patch?:
http://www.freebsd.org/~attilio/unionfs_missing_insmntque_lock.patch
I think that the unlocking is due at that point as the vnode lock can
be switch later on.
Let me know what you think about it and what the test does.
Attilio
--
Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 15 篇):