Re: lock violation in unionfs (9.0-STABLE r230270)

看板FB_stable作者時間14年前 (2012/02/15 18:01), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串2/15 (看更多)
2012/2/13, Pavel Polyakov <bsd@kobyla.org>: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=165087 > > Occurs simply trying to use unionfs: > mount -t unionfs -o noatime /usr /mnt > > insmntque: mp-safe fs and non-locked vp: 0xfffffe01d96704f0 is not > exclusive locked but should be > KDB: enter: lock violation Pavel, can you give a spin to this patch?: http://www.freebsd.org/~attilio/unionfs_missing_insmntque_lock.patch I think that the unlocking is due at that point as the vnode lock can be switch later on. Let me know what you think about it and what the test does. Attilio -- Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #1FEu9VJk (FB_stable)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1FEu9VJk (FB_stable)