Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is unc

My point (which may or may not be valid) was that if the vulnerabilities
remained *undisclosed*, they would have a much lower chance of being
exploited.

On 12/23/11 5:47 PM, Joe Holden wrote:
> So don't update until Monday? The outcome will be the same :)
> 
> Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>> Hey up list,
>>
>>
>>
>> Look, just a rant here.
>>
>>
>> Who in *HELL* thought it would be a cool idea to release no less than
>> FOUR security advisories today ?
>>
>> I mean, couldn't this have waited and remained undisclosed until monday ?
>>
>> I for one do *NOT* relish the idea of updating 50+ boxes this evening
>> and tomorrow !
>>
>>
>> Not to mention a whole lot of merchants and banks have toggled IT Freeze
>> a few weeks ago, to ensure xmas shopping doesn't get disturbed by
>> production changes.
>>
>>
>> Seriously, this is just irritating.
>>
>>
>> /flame
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
> 
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"