Re: TTY task group scheduling

看板FB_stable作者時間15年前 (2010/11/19 03:32), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串11/40 (看更多)
On Thu Nov 18 10, Rob Farmer wrote: > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:39, Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com> wrote: > > Frankly, I'm also turned off by the attempt to popup a full page ad in addition to the rest of the advertising content which surrounds what is nominally supposed to be the real content. 糍hat doesn't mean there is anything wrong with the patch or the notion of adjusting the scheduler, but I don't see any value added from these phoronix.com links. > > Most stuff on Phoronix is of dubious value, and they have outright > lied about stuff in the past, in order to drum up advertising business > (such as Steam on Linux, which Value has consistently said isn't > happening). so we need a trusted source to check whether the impact of the ~200 line patch as claimed by phoronix remains valid. can anybody test this? or provide links to independant benchmark results? cheers. alex > > -- > Rob Farmer -- a13x _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #1CvNypK7 (FB_stable)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1CvNypK7 (FB_stable)