討論串please test: Secure ports tree updating
共 9 篇文章
內容預覽:
Peter Jeremy wrote:. > It sounds like you've re-invented CTM rather than a CVSup replacement.. > Would you care to provide a comparison of portsnap wi
(還有2077個字)
內容預覽:
On Tue, 2004-Oct-26 20:58:54 +0100, Colin Percival wrote:. >CVSup is slow, insecure, and a memory hog. However, until now. >it's been the only option
(還有616個字)
內容預覽:
Dag-Erling Sm鷨grav wrote:. > Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk> writes:. >>CVSup is slow, insecure, and a memory hog.. >. > if cvsup is s
(還有672個字)
內容預覽:
David Rhodus wrote:. > Is this something that can be used to replace cvsup in a general term. > like cvsync ?. In theory, maybe, but in practice, no.
(還有1168個字)
內容預覽:
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 15:17:00 +0200, Marton Kenyeres. <mkenyeres@konvergencia.hu> wrote:. > Any suggestions on what typical usage scenarios and updatin
(還有418個字)