Re: PAM modules

Xin LI <delphij@delphij.net> writes:
> The main concern I have is that users might want to stay on an older
> FreeBSD release, while wanting features of a new OpenLDAP.  That's why
> I would prefer a libxml style import -- users always have choice to
> install a new OpenLDAP without any concern of breaking their system
> and we can always deliver security fixes with freebsd-update.  Would
> that make the trimmed down and renamed OpenLDAP import sound sensible?

Yes, you have a point.  So you're saying:

 - client side only (for nss_ldap, pam_ldap etc)
 - namespace hacks to avoid colliding with the port

right?  I would definitely support that.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"