Re: MD5 Collisions...

看板FB_security作者時間18年前 (2007/12/03 19:15), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串4/18 (看更多)
On Sun, 2 Dec 2007 23:21:21 -0800 (PST) jason <freebsd-security@dfmm.org> wrote: > Anyone in a position to understand what's going on here already knew. And > anyone who doesn't understand these results is not going to be able to > make any effective use of an advisory, and they're just going to get > scared over nothing. Therefore, I don't think any kind of advisory is > warranted. fair enough. I also know that ports,etc dont solely rely on md5, but I think the text in man md5 could be made a bit updated a bit, or maybe point to some external reference with more updated information... just my $0.01 anyway ;) thanks, B _________________________ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome Two things have come out of Berkeley, Unix and LSD. It is uncertain which caused the other. I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned. _______________________________________________ freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #17K-L100 (FB_security)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #17K-L100 (FB_security)