Re: [patch] Memory leak from namei_zone in an error path in

看板FB_security作者時間19年前 (2006/10/21 16:19), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串1/1
> --- nfs_serv.c 2005-11-25 06:32:38.000000000 -0800 > +++ /tmp/nfs_serv.c 2006-09-22 14:41:39.000000000 -0700 > @@ -2514,26 +2514,26 @@ > /* > * The VOP_RENAME function releases all vnode references & > * locks prior to returning so we need to clear the pointers > * to bypass cleanup code later on. > */ > error = VOP_RENAME(fromnd.ni_dvp, fromnd.ni_vp, &fromnd.ni_cnd, > tond.ni_dvp, tond.ni_vp, &tond.ni_cnd); > fromnd.ni_dvp = NULL; > fromnd.ni_vp = NULL; > tond.ni_dvp = NULL; > tond.ni_vp = NULL; > if (error) { > - fromnd.ni_cnd.cn_flags &= ~HASBUF; > - tond.ni_cnd.cn_flags &= ~HASBUF; > + NDFREE(&fromnd, NDF_ONLY_PNBUF); > + NDFREE(&tond, NDF_ONLY_PNBUF); > } > } else { > if (error == -1) > error = 0; > } > /* fall through */ > > > I will be happy to answer any questions wrt this. Please provide me some > feedback on this fix. Seems about right, but why does it clear HASBUF at all? Rev.1.79 added a lot of similar clearings of HASBUF, but rev.1.91 converted all instances of HASBUF except the above 2 above and 1 in a comment into NDFREE(). I think associated changes also moved the VOP_ABORTUP() calls into the vfs layer and out of the HASBUF conditionals. It looks like the leak was in rev.1.90 and rev.1.91 tried too hard not to change the logic by leaving the 2 buggy HASBUF clearings untouched. The comment about HASBUF is now bogus -- _we_ now mostly don't use HASBUF to track the clearing of the name buffer -- now namei iinternals do that and we only (?) use it to implement the leak :-). Bruce _______________________________________________ freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #15ETW500 (FB_security)