RE: Any ongoing effort to port /etc/rc.d/pf_boot,

看板FB_security作者時間19年前 (2006/07/17 20:13), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串1/1
=20 > I'm not sure the average user _really_ is worried enough=20 > about that half a second period on boot. But I DO know there=20 > will be people locking themselves out from far-away remote=20 > hosts (on updates, for instance) if this becomes the default. That is pretty much guaranteed. Murphy will always find a way to f*ck up = a reboot and simultaneously cause the 2611 on the console port to halt and catch fire.=20 If punters want a default block, IMHO it doesn=92t get much easier than = using the mac_ifoff(4) kernel option discussed earlier on in the week, they = can tweak the pf startup to twiddle the relevant sysctl appropriately at the right moment in time.=20 In order to salve the consciences of those who know naught but tick = boxes, and more importantly make them STFU and annoy someone else.=20 Perhaps a codicil to the FreeBSD pf.conf manpage, detailing the = mac_ifoff approach as a wholly unsupported solution for 'default block' to satisfy = the anally retentive.=20 Greg _______________________________________________ freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #14ktxY00 (FB_security)