Re: Reflections on Trusting Trust

看板FB_security作者時間20年前 (2005/11/30 07:31), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串11/36 (看更多)
--EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 01:36:31PM -0200, aristeu wrote: > I'm new here, and I've posted only once. I just want to add my "just=20 > another user" opinion on this... >=20 > Signing security advisories that sends the hashes for a file does a nice= =20 > job. >=20 > I think the only problem that exists is the package/ports deployment. I= =20 > belive we can't trust only on hashes for this (tar already does a fine jo= b=20 > on integrity...), because it can be easily circunvented. Maybe trusting= =20 > this it is the real weakest link... I'd be happy to work with someone who can implement a solution for the package side. The important thing to keep in mind is that packages are built automatically on many distributed machines. Any solution for signing packages would therefore need to also be automated, e.g. signing them automatically when the packages are pulled back from the build client to server. Kris --EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDjOPHWry0BWjoQKURAp5aAJ0XVkDRkRHqAoRd8BwSLF3TGbW9OACfXY2q 2AJSefUV4wqflt2F5PgY92c= =Ylsy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm--
文章代碼(AID): #13ZEIy00 (FB_security)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #13ZEIy00 (FB_security)