Re: Other possible protection against RST/SYN attacks (was Re: T

看板FB_security作者時間22年前 (2004/04/22 12:36), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串5/16 (看更多)
On Apr 21, 2004, at 4:14 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote: > What side effects if any are there? Why is the default 64 and not > some other number like 255... The default TTL gets decremented with every hop, which means that a packet coming in with a TTL of 255 had to be sent by a directly connected system. [ip_ttl is an octet, so it can't hold a larger TTL value.] A packet with a TTL of 64 could have been many hops away. -- -Chuck _______________________________________________ freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #10XqlJ00 (FB_security)
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 5 之 16 篇):
文章代碼(AID): #10XqlJ00 (FB_security)