Re: Other possible protection against RST/SYN attacks (was Re: T

看板FB_security作者時間22年前 (2004/04/22 12:21), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串3/16 (看更多)
> Thanks, I realize that, especially with iBGP. However for directly > connected eBGP peers, the question still stands. > > What side effects if any are there? Why is the default 64 and not > some other number like 255... I am sure the answer is out there, I > just need to find the question so I can cram it into google ;-) I can only think that it is a reasonable default. With a ttl of 200, for example, a routing loop would waste a lot of bandwidth for each undeliverable packet. Borja. _______________________________________________ freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #10XqXG00 (FB_security)
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 16 篇):
文章代碼(AID): #10XqXG00 (FB_security)