Re: cvs commit: ports/multimedia/xine Makefile
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enigB4BBD23C646BC8863A0BBF5E
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Essentially this means that I should not automatically add every entry
> of the VuXML document to the portaudit database, since being listed there
> means `do not use this port', which is the equivalent to `FORBIDDEN'.
Why? I mean, seriously, if I choose to install portaudit and portaudit's
presence prevents me from installing ports that's okay, but enforcing this
even when I _don't_ want to use portaudit it's not, IMHO. Actually, I always
thought portaudit was all about providing a way of making ports off-limits
_without_ CVS being involved. So I agree with Jacques here, portaudit and
FORBIDDEN should remain separate.
--
,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org
(/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org
\u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
--------------enigB4BBD23C646BC8863A0BBF5E
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows 2000)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Netscape - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFAaKCyXhc68WspdLARAqdAAKCFJ5PN+cdTN08svrb1Hwuplz89zgCePbzn
aDSPx0TPSjDhXdQhyVXtiy4=
=u02m
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--------------enigB4BBD23C646BC8863A0BBF5E--
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 4 之 21 篇)：