討論串deciding UFS vs ZFS
共 14 篇文章
首頁
上一頁
1
2
3
下一頁
尾頁

推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)留言0則,0人參與, 最新作者DStaal.時間11年前 (2014/07/20 04:32), 編輯資訊
0
0
1
內容預覽:
--As of July 18, 2014 6:04:16 PM +0100, RW is alleged to have said:. >> "I was really more interested in whether ZFS (with ARC) is faster than. >> UFS
(還有1846個字)

推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)留言0則,0人參與, 最新作者rwmaillists.時間11年前 (2014/07/19 02:32), 編輯資訊
0
0
1
內容預覽:
On Fri, 18 Jul 2014 09:48:24 +0100. krad wrote:. > "I don't understand why you think that. My point was that losing. > random files from everything ca
(還有1498個字)

推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)留言0則,0人參與, 最新作者kraduk.時間11年前 (2014/07/18 17:01), 編輯資訊
0
0
1
內容預覽:
"I don't understand why you think that. My point was that losing random. files from everything can be far more disruptive than losing files from. a si
(還有1240個字)

推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)留言0則,0人參與, 最新作者rwmaillists.時間11年前 (2014/07/17 02:01), 編輯資訊
0
0
1
內容預覽:
On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 09:27:59 +0100. krad wrote:. > UFS with SU+J surely, gjournal is now depreciated in 9.x onwards. In common with a lot of people I
(還有964個字)

推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)留言0則,0人參與, 最新作者kraduk.時間11年前 (2014/07/16 16:32), 編輯資訊
0
0
1
內容預覽:
UFS with SU+J surely, gjournal is now depreciated in 9.x onwards. Its your choice of course, but the spreading around argument doesn't hold. water as
(還有2073個字)
首頁
上一頁
1
2
3
下一頁
尾頁