Re: Freebsd-update to 9.3 from 9.2
On 18 July 2014, at 16:40, Michael Powell <nightrecon@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Doug Hardie wrote:
> =
> [snip]
>> =
>> =
>> svn doesn't work either:
>> =
>> svn checkout https://svn0.us-west.FreeBSD.org/base/release/9.3.0 /usr/src
> =
> Incorrect syntax, which creates a new problem that didn't exist yet.
Thats interesting. The command I used came directly from the manual. It a=
lso worked. There is a real problem with the documentation for upgrading t=
he base and ports. The typical man page structure only tells you what the =
various flags are etc. It doesn't tell you how to accomplish the normal go=
als. There needs to be some direction and examples on using these things f=
or the normal admin functions of updating a system.
> =
>> The latest version of UPDATING I get is from 20130705. The web reposito=
ry
>> shows the latest entry as 20140716. I have used FreeBSD since 2.5.4 and
>> it used to be easy to manage. Now its virtually impossible. Complete
>> reinstalls on production systems are just not viable. We need a working
>> way to upgrade. I haven't found it yet.
> =
> I have exactly zero experience with freebsd-update, and do not want to se=
em =
> disparaging towards the work of someone much smarter than me. I also have=
a =
> noted tendency to stick with what has worked well in the past and don't =
> change things until either I have a really good reason or some other chan=
ge =
> makes trying "the new way" mandatory with no choice. Hence I still do =
> upgrades along the make world/buildworld/etc dance. Generally speaking, I=
've =
> been doing it this way since circa 2000 and have had almost never a probl=
em =
> so I stick with it.
> =
> Under a populated /usr/src there is a .svn subdirectory. I actually know =
> very little about subversion, but I think this directory contains all the =
> internal housekeeping. I've noticed before the header in many of the file=
s =
> I've read through all seem to contain OS version information. If you have=
a =
> populated /usr/src you can cd to /usr/src and do rm -rf * and this will w=
ipe =
> everything _except_ the .svn subdirectory. You will first need to chflags=
-R =
> noschg on this directory before you can rm -rf it.
There is no mention of any of that in the manual=85
> =
> Once wiped clean, do this:
> =
> svn checkout svn://svn0.us-west.FreeBSD.org/base/releng/9.3 /usr/src
> =
> Please note the svn:// , releng instead of release, and the space before =
> /usr/src. This will pull in a fresh source tree for 9.3. To update do thi=
s:
> =
> svn update /usr/src
> =
> Usually running this immediately after pulling in a fresh tree does nothi=
ng, =
> other than tell you you're already at the latest. If time goes by and =
> security updates come out the svn update /usr/src command will pull in wh=
at =
> once was known as the release 'security' branch. Of course, any of this o=
nly =
> applies to NOT using freebsd-update.
> =
> One of the really neat things I do like is the revision number. You will =
see =
> it in uname like this: 9.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE #0 r268715. I have =
> one machine left that only has a CD burner instead of the DVD burner all =
the =
> others enjoy. So in order to fit a backup dump on a CD I have to delete t=
he =
> source tree. If at some point later I should need to pull in the source t=
ree =
> that matches my existing kernel I look up the revision number in uname a=
nd =
> do something like this:
> =
> svn checkout -r r268715 svn://svn0.us-west.FreeBSD.org/base/releng/9.3 =
> /usr/src
> =
> Using the revision numbers in this fashion allows for world and kernel to =
> stay in sync. Typically this is not required most of the time, but I like =
> very much that the feature exists and is so easy to utilize.
> =
> I can't speak to the original situation where the source tree was stale a=
fter =
> freebsd-update. I simply just know next to nothing about freebsd-update, =
> other than problems people have had with it that I've read about on the =
> list. I've been steadily doing source based upgrades for 14 years and it =
> works so I keep doing it that way. :-)
I have been using the freebsd-update approach on several systems without is=
sues till now. Some use generic kernels and then it works great.
> =
> -Mike
> =
> =
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o=
rg"
> =
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 10 之 19 篇):