討論串Dropping maintainership of my ports
共 18 篇文章

推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)留言0則,0人參與, 最新作者linimon.時間15年前 (2011/04/29 08:01), 編輯資訊
0
0
1
內容預覽:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:23:23AM +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote:. > Maybe, if maintainer can "somehow easily" become ports committer,. > this hurdle might
(還有540個字)

推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)留言0則,0人參與, 最新作者perryh.時間15年前 (2011/04/28 19:01), 編輯資訊
0
0
1
內容預覽:
Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> wrote:. > > I've been told that we shouldn't be looking for reasons. > > to save any unmaintained port,. >. > What
(還有1844個字)

推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)留言0則,0人參與, 最新作者talon.時間15年前 (2011/04/28 02:01), 編輯資訊
0
0
4
內容預覽:
Eitan Adler wrote:. > There is a lot of work that has to be done in the background even if. > no new ports are added. Things like the gmake upgrade an
(還有3232個字)

推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)留言0則,0人參與, 最新作者db.時間15年前 (2011/04/28 02:01), 編輯資訊
0
0
2
內容預覽:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 07:35:58AM -0400, Jerry wrote:. > On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 09:49:58 +0200. > Erik Trulsson <ertr1013@student.uu.se> articulated:. >
(還有1666個字)

推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)留言0則,0人參與, 最新作者utisoft.時間15年前 (2011/04/28 02:01), 編輯資訊
0
0
2
內容預覽:
On 27 April 2011 13:54, Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu> wrote:. > Eitan Adler wrote:. >> Things like the gmake upgrade and new ports. >> features take a
(還有797個字)