討論串vkernel & GSoC, some questions
共 34 篇文章

推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)留言0則,0人參與, 最新作者kris.時間18年前 (2008/03/18 04:08), 編輯資訊
0
0
1
內容預覽:
Matthew Dillon wrote:. > :> Well, I don't think I would agree with your assessment but,. > :> particularly, the way vkernels are implemented in Dragon
(還有831個字)

推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)留言0則,0人參與, 最新作者dillon.時間18年前 (2008/03/18 02:39), 編輯資訊
0
0
1
內容預覽:
Huh. Well, that's about the last thing I would have thought would be. considered disruptive to the kernel source. Everyone liked those changes.. mallo
(還有1264個字)

推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)留言0則,0人參與, 最新作者maslanbsd.時間18年前 (2008/03/18 02:15), 編輯資訊
0
0
2
內容預覽:
Hi all,. Aren't we working on a FreeBSD/Xen port ???. I think we don't need a Linux like KVM or DragonFly's vkernel, if we. could run FreeBSD in dom0.
(還有2262個字)

推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)留言0則,0人參與, 最新作者kip.時間18年前 (2008/03/17 11:39), 編輯資訊
0
0
1
內容預覽:
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 8:06 PM, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote:. > On 16/03/2008, Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> wrote:. >. > > Another
(還有1550個字)

推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)留言0則,0人參與, 最新作者adrian.時間18年前 (2008/03/17 11:07), 編輯資訊
0
0
1
內容預覽:
On 16/03/2008, Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> wrote:. > Another avenue to consider is the Linux KVM virtualization technology, which> is seeing a
(還有1209個字)