Re: Best practice for accepting TCP connections on multicore?

看板FB_hackers作者時間11年前 (2014/06/08 02:01), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串8/18 (看更多)
On 7 June 2014 01:53, Dirk Engling <erdgeist@erdgeist.org> wrote: > > On Sat, 7 Jun 2014, Daniel Janzon wrote: > > Is there any better way than doing the accept() call in one thread and >> then >> dispatch it to a thread on another core with any user space method? >> > See C10K problem [1]. Why use accept() and not kevent()? You need to keep it portable? > Has anyone rebutted the threads better than events paper[2] yet? 1. http://www.kegel.com/c10k.html 2. https://www.usenix.org/legacy/events/hotos03/tech/full_papers/vonbehren/vonbehren.pdf -- Igor M. _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #1JarDV9S (FB_hackers)
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 8 之 18 篇):
文章代碼(AID): #1JarDV9S (FB_hackers)