Re: [patch] enhance powerd(8) to handle max temperature

看板FB_hackers作者時間18年前 (2007/08/13 14:38), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串17/27 (看更多)
Julian Elischer wrote: > Garrett Cooper wrote: >> M. Warner Losh wrote: >>> In message: <46AE8F78.1060203@root.org> >>> Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> writes: >>> : Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: >>> : >>>>>> On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 23:31:33 +0200 >>> : >>>>>> Pietro Cerutti <gahr@gahr.ch> said: >>> : > gahr> My patch is really just a first draft that I wrote in order >>> to have >>> : > gahr> feedbacks on the general idea to implement a temperature >>> controlling >>> : > gahr> system inside powerd, and doesn't implement hysteresis as >>> you noted, and >>> : > gahr> your feedback is that it's not a good idea, which I respect. >>> : > : > It is rather backward, IMHO. I did implement a passive cooling >>> : > feature as an enhancement of powerd(8) like you did, during initial >>> : > phases. Then, I implemented it in our kernel as a result. >>> : : I'll take a look at your patch. Umemoto-san is right in that you >>> really >>> : want the kernel to control cooling. What happens if powerd dies/hangs >>> : and your system burns up? Passive cooling is often a last resort to >>> : keep the system from overheating. >>> >>> I keep getting the system shutting down on my HP by FreeBSD because >>> the temperature exceeds the _CRT value. Maybe there's something wrong >>> with my values, since it happens a lot: >>> >>> hw.acpi.thermal.min_runtime: 0 >>> hw.acpi.thermal.polling_rate: 10 >>> hw.acpi.thermal.user_override: 0 >>> hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.temperature: 0.0C >>> hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.active: -1 >>> hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.passive_cooling: 1 >>> hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.thermal_flags: 0 >>> hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._PSV: 90.0C >>> hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._HOT: -1 >>> hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._CRT: 94.0C >>> hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._ACx: 40.0C -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 >>> >>> Note: temperature is always 0.0C. >>> >>> What can I do to help my situation, if I really want the kernel doing >>> the cooling? >>> >>> Warner >>> >> >> Wow, something's really wrong with those calculated temperatures. At >> that value most of the plastic and weaker circuitry should have fused >> together =\. > > It would be interesting to see what the values are just after booting, > or even earlier if you can get the bios to give temperatures (some MBs > have that possibility) I might add, after all cooling down to room temperature over night. > _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #16l_nL00 (FB_hackers)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #16l_nL00 (FB_hackers)