討論串NewNFS vs. oldNFS for 10.0?
共 22 篇文章

推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)留言0則,0人參與, 最新作者peter.時間12年前 (2013/04/27 14:01), 編輯資訊
0
0
1
內容預覽:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 01:43:24PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:. > On 15.03.2013 15:08, Rick Macklem wrote:. > > Lars Eggert wrote:. > >> Hi,. > >>.
(還有1613個字)

推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)留言0則,0人參與, 最新作者andre.時間12年前 (2013/04/27 14:01), 編輯資訊
0
0
1
內容預覽:
On 16.03.2013 01:44, Peter Wemm wrote:. > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 2:03 PM, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> wrote:. >> On Friday, March 15, 2013 11:24:3
(還有2758個字)

推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)留言0則,0人參與, 最新作者rmacklem.時間12年前 (2013/04/27 14:01), 編輯資訊
0
0
1
內容預覽:
Freddie Cash wrote:. > Isn't the general process (or at least past pattern) to:. > - have 1 release cycle with just the old code (aka 8.x with oldNFS)
(還有2327個字)

推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)留言0則,0人參與, 最新作者bright.時間12年前 (2013/04/27 14:01), 編輯資訊
0
0
1
內容預覽:
On 3/15/13 10:55 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:. > On 15 March 2013 09:55, Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> wrote:. >. >> Finally, I think it is really prema
(還有1353個字)

推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)留言0則,0人參與, 最新作者andre.時間12年前 (2013/04/27 14:01), 編輯資訊
0
0
1
內容預覽:
On 15.03.2013 14:46, John Baldwin wrote:. > On Friday, March 15, 2013 9:40:56 am Andre Oppermann wrote:. >> Hi Rick, all,. >>. >> is there a plan to d
(還有1246個字)