討論串(void)foo or __unused foo ?
共 8 篇文章
內容預覽:
On Jul 27, 2012, at 2:38 AM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:. >=20. > The alternative way to avoid an 'unused' warning from the compiler. > is an empty statement.
(還有796個字)
內容預覽:
In message <20120727125134.GA58187@onelab2.iet.unipi.it>, Luigi Rizzo writes:. >A comment might be used to explain the intention in even more detail:.
(還有526個字)
內容預覽:
I'd rather see a compiler-interpretable "way" of doing this.. You could always just use your own for now, until something comes. along (like how many
(還有491個字)
內容預覽:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:20:48AM +0000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:. > In message <20120727093824.GB56662@onelab2.iet.unipi.it>, Luigi Rizzo writes:>.
(還有846個字)
內容預覽:
In message <20120727093824.GB56662@onelab2.iet.unipi.it>, Luigi Rizzo writes:. >The alternative way to avoid an 'unused' warning from the compiler. >i
(還有629個字)