Re: patch to add AES intrinsics to gcc

看板FB_current作者時間12年前 (2013/08/23 19:01), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串6/22 (看更多)
On 23 Aug 2013, at 10:58, Bernhard Fr=F6hlich <decke@freebsd.org> wrote: > I don't know if you are aware that IF you really do that we will have ser= ious > problems to ship packages for 10. USE_GCC=3Dany is the fallback in the > portstree for all ports that are unable to build with clang which was int= roduced > when HEAD switched to clang as default cc. Right now there are 150 ports = in > the tree that use this fallback and quite a few of them are high profile = ports: > = > the highlights: > audio/nas devel/mingw32-binutils emulators/qemu emulators/virtualbox-ose > emulators/wine lang/go lang/v8 mail/courier math/fftw3 multimedia/libxine > multimedia/gstreamer multimedia/gstreamer-plugins multimedia/x264 > security/clamav > = > the full list: > http://dpaste.com/1354075/ > = > A possible hack could be to add a check for USE_GCC=3Dany to behave like > a USE_GCC=3Dyes on HEAD on the affected platforms. This pulls in lang/gcc > from ports for a lot of people on HEAD I suppose. > = > We certainly need to do that switch to remove the ancient gcc from base > some time but with my portmgr hat on I can only say we don't plan to do t= hat > before 10.0 especially not if we are only talking about a few weeks time = window. That is unfortunate. We have said for over a year that 10.0 should not shi= p with gcc. I can delay committing the patch to flip the switch until late= r in the code slush, if re approves, but ports that require gcc should be b= uilding with gcc from ports (which will also improve code quality, as gcc 4= ..6/7 produce significantly better code than 4.2.1). David _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #1I5q3kQL (FB_current)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1I5q3kQL (FB_current)