Re: ipfilter(4) needs maintainer

On 14.04.13 21:55, Joe Holden wrote:
> For non-nat ipfw is still superior in every way, numbered rules 
> (think: scripts), dummynet, much faster than pf, syntax is a lot nicer 
> and predictable...

And, best of all, it still is buggy. At lest, it's tables handling is 
unusable.

I have been very stubborn IPFW user for very long time, but finally gave 
up in favor of PF. Nothing like that ever since. I am also not convinced 
IPFW is any faster than PF.

Daniel
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"