Re: ipfilter(4) needs maintainer

On Monday April 15 2013 12:32:37 Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> And, yes, NAT64 will be useful for sure, but it is another story,
> not IPv6<->IPv6 translation.

Fear not, NPT66 prefix translation is stateless,
this is nothing like NAT44 / NAPT.

On Monday April 15 2013 12:51:00 sthaug@nethelp.no wrote:
> We are *way* too late in the game to completely avoid IPv6 NAT.
> Various flavors already exist in the form of RFCs, e.g. NPTv6:
> 	http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6296

Prefix translation is useful for SOHO or branch offices with
more than one uplink, unless one wants to invest into AS and BGP
or start building tunnels:

  http://blog.ioshints.info/2011/12/we-just-might-need-nat66.html

Mark
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"