Re: Any objections/comments on axing out old ATA stack?

On 28.03.2013 02:43, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> My main concern with the new stuff is that it requires CAM and that's
> reasonably big compared to the standalone ATA code.
>
> It'd be nice if we could slim down the CAM stack a bit first; it makes
> embedding it on the smaller devices really freaking painful.

Are there many boards now with ATA, but without USB? But I agree, it 
should be checked.

-- 
Alexander Motin
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"