Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm
--+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 2012-Nov-10 09:16:32 +1100, Brett <brett.mahar@gmx.com> wrote:
>Just an observation: a few years ago when I got sick of Linux's
>"headlong rush" development model, I subscribed to various BSD
>mailing lists to see what else was out there. I considered FreeBSD at
>the time - there was a neverending avalanche of "[head tinderbox]
>failure" messages.
The Project tries to avoid it but occasional build failures on the
development branch are very likely to occur. As a new user, you
would be much better off starting with a release branch.
>This told me that I would be more likely to be running code written
>by people who knew what they were doing if I went with Open, Net, or
>DragonflyBSD.
I think that's being unfair. Do Open, Net or DFly have an equivalent
to the tinderboxes that do automated test builds and report failures?
And, since you have replied to an ARM failure, DragonflyBSD would not
be an option since it doesn't support ARM.
--=20
Peter Jeremy
--+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)
iEYEARECAAYFAlCeSdAACgkQ/opHv/APuIf7zgCfR7FA9+K9GViGq5x/gbnX9Gxq
gykAoKVwQTlIzP7zjHo5kdOhZ/E9oF1r
=2oUI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI--
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 197 之 388 篇)：