Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

On 9 November 2012 14:37, Chuck Burns <break19@gmail.com> wrote:

> Adrian. diskspace and cpu cycles are things I can spare, drop me a line
> outside of the ML and we can discuss particulars. "It's just a personal
> box.. on a residential internet service, I have an amd64 box with 600G free
> on my pool.. 8G ram.. and I have a smaller i386 box... 100G or so free, 512M
> ram..  just drop me a line..

Hi,

Those I do have - I have access to all of the ref* boxes in the
cluster. I'm just typically hacking on this stuff on the train or at a
cafe, and I don't have a workflow setup for pushing out potential
diffs to build machines that have all the grunt/disk space for each
little change that I do.

I'm sorry about breaking things from time to time, but besides a small
handful of "what was I thinking?!" things, the build breaks are just
that - build breaks. They're easily fixed.

Adrian
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"