Re: clang and static linking?

On 2012-11-09 17:45, Roman Divacky wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 08:43:04AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
....
....
>> I'll try this shortly.  Does this mean that we need to build
>> all *.a libraries where a weak reference may occur with this
>> switch?
>
> No, this has nothing to do with llvm integrated asm.
>
> So far it looks like gcc always inline "isnan" even at O0 while
> clang does not. We are trying to figure out the solution.

No, it is not related to the optimization level.  It looks like isnan()
is a builtin for gcc, but not for clang.  The isnan() macro expands to a
isnan() call for a few of libm's objects:

	s_fdim.o
	s_csqrt.o
	e_scalb.o

> Maybe use __builtin_isnan instead of isnan in the isnan macro expansion?

Either that, or if people prefer to use libc's isnan() implementation,
make sure gcc also calls it instead.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"