Re: freebsd-current Digest, Vol 464, Issue 3
On 2012-09-05 09:34, freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I recently performed a series of compiler performance tests on FreeBSD
> 10.0-CURRENT, particularly comparing gcc 4.2.1 and gcc 4.7.1 against
> clang 3.1 and clang 3.2.
Hey,
you've got a cool idea, but the implementation ain't good...you can't
compare optimising compilers w/out comparing optimisation quality. If
you don't go all-out in one dimension, both are necessary. You conclude
that Clang is faster. But maybe if you lowered optimisation level on
gcc, it would become faster and stronger than Clang at the same time? We
don't know, it hasn't been tested.
Regards,
--
Twoje radio
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"