Re: Clang as default compiler November 4th

看板FB_current作者時間13年前 (2012/09/12 02:01), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串40/86 (看更多)
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> wrote: <snip> > Can you, please, read what I wrote ? Fixing _ports_ to compile with > clang is plain wrong. Upstream developers use gcc almost always for > development and testing. Establishing another constant cost on the > porting work puts burden on the ports submitters, maintainers and even > ports users. > > I do strongly oppose the attempt to drain the freebsd resources by > forcing porters to port third-party code to other compiler. I agree with this pretty much. I haven't done fix any of port build with clang as I simply ignore clang (sorry). When user report to me and I tell them to stick with GCC as I don't support it. Cheers, Mezz -- mezz.freebsd@gmail.com - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #1GJtnVQz (FB_current)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1GJtnVQz (FB_current)