Re: pkgng 1.0 release schedule, and HEAD switch to pkgng by defa

看板FB_current作者時間13年前 (2012/08/22 03:01), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串5/17 (看更多)
--ofZMSlrAVk9bLeVm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:17:36AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > On 8/21/2012 6:46 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > I would also like to just remove pkg_* tools from RELENG_10 if that fit= s the > > schedule. >=20 > Um, no? >=20 > Until pkg becomes mandatory (which can't happen for several years) the > pkg_* tools can't be removed altogether. >=20 > What _would_ be useful is what should have been done many years ago when > it was first suggested: Move the pkg_* tools to ports. >=20 > It's too late for 9.1 already, but if you made that change today in > HEAD, and after 9.1 (but before 8.4) you MFC it to stable/[89], then you > could theoretically make pkg mandatory after 9.1 EOLs. >=20 > To make my point more clear, the ports tree has to support the last > release to ship with pkg_* tools in the base throughout its lifetime. To > do anything else would be be a massive POLA violation. >=20 > Doug >=20 > --=20 >=20 > I am only one, but I am one. I cannot do everything, but I can do > something. And I will not let what I cannot do interfere with what > I can do. > -- Edward Everett Hale, (1822 - 1909) that is what I meant of course, sorry if I badly said it at first Bapt --ofZMSlrAVk9bLeVm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlAz1AQACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EyOSQCcCqNHoKOuooxpf2PVr62Dlz65 z14An1MF8LFu2wkrANjxZbP5DZyXvSEJ =UC3c -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ofZMSlrAVk9bLeVm--
文章代碼(AID): #1GCzhk5K (FB_current)
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 5 之 17 篇):
文章代碼(AID): #1GCzhk5K (FB_current)