Re: newbus' ivar's limitation..

看板FB_current作者時間13年前 (2012/07/12 21:32), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串16/26 (看更多)
On Jul 12, 2012, at 6:01 AM, John Baldwin wrote: > New-bus is certainly not the only way to organize a device hierarchy = and is=20 > not perfect, but in your case I suggest you tone down your language = until you=20 > have enough information to develop an informed opinion. It is also not the only way to represent relationships between objects, = or to export services to the rest of the kernel. =46rom earlier = descriptions, it seems like some of these relationships aren't very = newbus-y. =46rom what I know about FDT, many of them are 'this device's = interrupt pin is tied to GPIO 12 on controller 3' which isn't a = parent/child relationship, but rather some kind of interrupt cookie = you'll need to implement bus_setup_intr. Warner _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #1F_j7ISV (FB_current)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1F_j7ISV (FB_current)