Re: Use of C99 extra long double math functions after r236148

看板FB_current作者時間13年前 (2012/07/11 02:01), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串65/100 (看更多)
On Jul 10, 2012, at 9:11 AM, David Schultz wrote: > On Tue, Jul 10, 2012, Rainer Hurling wrote: >> On 10.07.2012 16:02 (UTC+2), Warner Losh wrote: >>>=20 >>> On Jul 10, 2012, at 3:10 AM, Rainer Hurling wrote: >>>> As far as I understand from discussions on R mailing list=20 >>>> (r-devel@r-project.org), they plan to reduce the emulation and/or=20= >>>> workaround of long and complex math functions for FreeBSD and other=20= >>>> systems with their next releases of R devel. So we could really = need some=20 >>>> progress with our C99 conform math functions ;-) >>>=20 >>> Not having R would be a bit pain in my backside. That's one of the=20= >>> practical considerations that I was talking about. It is very real, = and=20 >>> if I have to, I'll commit the #define junk I railed against to get = it=20 >>> back. Please, let's get some progress. I have some time to help. >>=20 >> Yes, thank you Warner, that is also my problem. As I wrote some weeks=20= >> ago (05/28/2012) when starting this thread, I am using FreeBSD as a=20= >> scientific desktop because of its good scaling properties. For some=20= >> years now, FreeBSD fits all our needs with R, SAGA GIS, PostgreSQL = and=20 >> some more. >>=20 >> If I would not be able to run upcoming versions of R on FreeBSD any=20= >> more, that would be really, really hard :-( >=20 > Do you have a list of the essential functions here? There are 17 long > double functions and some complex functions missing, but only a > handful of those are of general interest. The reason I ask is that if > R is just looking for a few missing functions that are already mostly > implemented, then the best solution is probably to finish that work. > But if it's expecting us to have something arcane like long double > Bessel functions of the first kind, then we need to pursue a = workaround > in the short term. I'll get a list, but they are things like long long double exp and ln. = I don't think they were the Bessel functions. Warner _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #1F_6tV74 (FB_current)
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 65 之 100 篇):
文章代碼(AID): #1F_6tV74 (FB_current)