Re: flowtable usable or not

看板FB_current作者時間14年前 (2012/03/02 17:01), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串7/30 (看更多)
On 03/01/2012 16:03, K. Macy wrote: > I understand the switch. Uptime is important in any production > network. However, it seems like it may have been too easy to turn it > off because no one has made any effort to help me debug the issues. By > analogy your guidance for ports usability problems would be to install > Ubuntu. Apparently you've missed all the times that I've given that exact advice. :) But your analogy is severely flawed. Flowtable was an experimental feature that theoretically might have increased performance for some work flows, but turned out to be fatally flawed. The ports system is an essential part of the FreeBSD operating *system*, depended on by virtually 100% of FreeBSD users. Users don't have any obligation to help us debug new/experimental features. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #1FK8nFTe (FB_current)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1FK8nFTe (FB_current)