Re: CVS removal from the base

看板FB_current作者時間14年前 (2011/12/06 02:01), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串60/76 (看更多)
Tom Evans <tevans.uk@googlemail.com> writes: > On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Max Khon <fjoe@samodelkin.net> wrote: >> CVS != csup. >> >> I wonder how many people will express their sentiments about CVS when >> they really mean cvsup/csup. > > I wasn't going to jump onto this bikeshed, as CVS will not be going > anywhere any time soon, I am sure. > > I use cvs, rather than csup. I use cvsup to fetch CVS archives to > /home/ncvs, and check out ports from there, as described in > development(7). > > If ports were no longer delivered via CVS, you may have had a point > about removing CVS from base - but they are not. Max Khon was the one who posted the original message in the thread. That message explicitly stated that moving ports and doc away from CVS was a prerequisite for removing CVS from base. As far as I've noticed, no one has challenged that. I'm trying to think of a way to fit the previous paragraph into the bikeshed metaphor, but I'm coming up with nothing. _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #1EtGRWUM (FB_current)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1EtGRWUM (FB_current)