Re: WITHOUT_PROFILE=yes by default
In message <4ED4222E.5010707@FreeBSD.org>, Doug Barton writes:
>On 11/28/2011 02:38, Max Khon wrote:
>> Are there any compelling reasons for having profiled libs to be built by
>> default?
>
>Nope. It's been one of the first things I disable after I install a new
>system for at least a decade.
>
>Ideally we could do this for 9.0.
Can we at least keep one (small) library compiled for profiling, so
that compiling for profiling doesn't get broken by accident ?
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 4 之 50 篇):