Re: aliasing (or renaming) kern.geom.debugflags

看板FB_current作者時間14年前 (2011/10/08 18:32), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串27/44 (看更多)
Hello, Poul-Henning. You wrote 8 =EE=EA=F2=FF=E1=F0=FF 2011 =E3., 12:18:54: > gmirror and this procedure has several problems: > 1. It steals the last sector on the disk. If that sector contained data > you lost them, with no notice. Most often it will not, particularly > on a freshly installed system, but it is still a bad thing. > 2. The paritioning is not fixed up to record the stealing of this sector. > I wouldn't be surprised if this could cause confusion down the road. Yes, see discussion about GPT and MBR problems in thread, which is named (and should be re-named already, really) "RFC: Project geom-events" > This is the kind of usage that makes me sad I ever added that option. Storing metadata of GEOM in last (or first) sector plays bad with MBR and, especially, GPT :( And I cannot see good solution for this. It seems, that GPT will be incompatible with any pure-software mirror or mirror-like RAID. --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #1Ea2QZyo (FB_current)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1Ea2QZyo (FB_current)