Re: RFC: Project geom-events

看板FB_current作者時間14年前 (2011/10/05 17:32), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串20/52 (看更多)
Hello, Alexander. You wrote 5 =EE=EA=F2=FF=E1=F0=FF 2011 =E3., 13:18:34: > geom_raid addresses this problem in own way. As soon as RAID BIOSes > expect RAIDs to be built on raw physical devices and probe order is not > discussed, geom_raid exclusively opens underlying providers immediately > after detecting supported metadata. So even if volume is broken or But it could be not first, who taste component of mirror, am I right? If geom_part will be first, will it "take away" component from geom_raid? Or it could not? If it works in any case (exclusive open spoils geom_part), it could be used in all other classes without any metadata infrastructure, but it seems, that geom_mirror, for example, could pickup metadtata from last parition instead of raw device... I'm not sure here. But, in any case, maybe standard first 16 bytes of metadata in pure-GEOM classes and filter in GEOM infrastructure itself ("not pass provider for tasting to anything but class, written in first 16 bytes of last sector") looks good idea, IMHO. --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #1EZ2GI68 (FB_current)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1EZ2GI68 (FB_current)