Re: Experiences with FreeBSD 9.0-BETA2

At 04:38 PM 9/26/2011, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:

>There was also general sentiment that the rise of ZFS would allow 
>just this sort of fine-grained partitioning, which is a huge 
>advantage of its ability to create datasets on the fly.  This 
>perception that ZFS is most of the future probably contributed to 
>the lack of strong opinions regarding the default UFS partition scheme.

Unfortunately, because ZFS is licensed under a viral license (not 
the GPL, but nonetheless one that isn't compatible with the BSD 
philosophy), I wouldn't want to see this happen. I'd rather see 
Hammer backported from Dragonfly.

--Brett

_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"