討論串Why top-posting is bad
共 21 篇文章

推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)留言0則,0人參與, 最新作者dan.時間21年前 (2004/08/30 20:57), 編輯資訊
0
0
2
內容預覽:
On Mon, 30 Aug 2004, Brad Knowles wrote:. > At 5:54 PM +0530 2004-08-30, Rahul Siddharthan wrote:. >. > > You're equating top-posting to an undone fly
(還有552個字)

推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)留言0則,0人參與, 最新作者brad.時間21年前 (2004/08/30 20:47), 編輯資訊
0
0
2
內容預覽:
At 5:54 PM +0530 2004-08-30, Rahul Siddharthan wrote:. > You're equating top-posting to an undone fly? Excuse me, take a look. > at the real world som
(還有774個字)

推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)留言0則,0人參與, 最新作者rsidd.時間21年前 (2004/08/30 20:28), 編輯資訊
0
0
1
內容預覽:
Brad Knowles said on Aug 30, 2004 at 13:45:07:. > > 1. In private mail, I really don't care, unless the formatting is. > > truly egregious. On such (v
(還有744個字)

推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)留言0則,0人參與, 最新作者brad.時間21年前 (2004/08/30 19:47), 編輯資訊
0
0
2
內容預覽:
At 4:28 PM +0530 2004-08-30, Rahul Siddharthan wrote:. > Tough. You're the one who's being picky about what you will or will. > not read.. I do choos
(還有2747個字)

推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)留言0則,0人參與, 最新作者rsidd.時間21年前 (2004/08/30 19:00), 編輯資訊
0
0
2
內容預覽:
Brad Knowles said on Aug 30, 2004 at 10:59:59:. > At 10:42 AM +0530 2004-08-30, Rahul Siddharthan wrote:. > > If you want to go about correcting the w
(還有1586個字)