[課業] 行政法之平等原則
題目如圖
請問(一)問是否違反平等原則
解題書:違反平等原則。觀其意旨應以行政自我拘束原則為解題方向。
個人看法:人不能主張不法之平等。平等權之適用僅限於合法領域。
不知哪種才合理
謝謝各位
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 101.10.55.51
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Examination/M.1460637612.A.760.html
推
04/14 20:47, , 1F
04/14 20:47, 1F
今天4/1,嚇不到我的
※ 編輯: FP557 (101.10.55.51), 04/14/2016 20:51:21
推
04/14 21:02, , 2F
04/14 21:02, 2F
→
04/14 21:02, , 3F
04/14 21:02, 3F
→
04/14 21:03, , 4F
04/14 21:03, 4F
→
04/14 21:03, , 5F
04/14 21:03, 5F
但行政機關並無正當理由而對甲處以12萬,對同樣情形的乙處以6萬,這看起來又違反平等?
※ 編輯: FP557 (101.10.55.51), 04/14/2016 21:12:09
推
04/14 22:13, , 6F
04/14 22:13, 6F
→
04/14 22:13, , 7F
04/14 22:13, 7F
→
04/14 22:13, , 8F
04/14 22:13, 8F
God
我只能給你口頭嘉獎了
謝謝
※ 編輯: FP557 (101.10.55.51), 04/14/2016 22:18:32
推
04/14 23:09, , 9F
04/14 23:09, 9F
→
04/14 23:09, , 10F
04/14 23:09, 10F
意思是
不法之平等只適用在機關之處分,如額定賑災金額每戶1萬,甲戶拿到2萬,乙戶不得主張與甲戶同樣要拿到2萬?
※ 編輯: FP557 (101.10.55.51), 04/15/2016 00:07:12
推
04/15 00:15, , 11F
04/15 00:15, 11F
推
04/15 00:48, , 12F
04/15 00:48, 12F
→
04/15 00:48, , 13F
04/15 00:48, 13F
→
04/15 00:48, , 14F
04/15 00:48, 14F
→
04/15 00:48, , 15F
04/15 00:48, 15F
→
04/15 00:50, , 16F
04/15 00:50, 16F
→
04/15 00:54, , 17F
04/15 00:54, 17F
→
04/15 00:54, , 18F
04/15 00:54, 18F
推
04/16 19:47, , 19F
04/16 19:47, 19F
推
04/17 15:30, , 20F
04/17 15:30, 20F
→
04/17 15:30, , 21F
04/17 15:30, 21F
→
04/17 15:30, , 22F
04/17 15:30, 22F
→
04/17 15:30, , 23F
04/17 15:30, 23F
→
04/17 15:30, , 24F
04/17 15:30, 24F