[課業] 民法:"代理"小問題
例：甲16歲屁孩，授與代理權給乙賣珍貴玩具車，乙賣給善意之丙
授與代理權→單獨行為→§78→無效
乙=>無權代理 →甲有承認權→因承認權是單獨行為→無效→甲丙間效力未定
因為甲的承認權無效→甲承認或拒絕承認都無效→甲丙間效力未定
若甲想把珍貴玩具車拿回來→甲有理由 因可對丙主張767 且甲有承認權:行使拒絕承認
>>> 但甲的拒絕承認不是無效嗎!? <<<
甲的承認權要生效的情況是：1.甲得到代理人的允許 2.甲之法代代為承認
怎麼會有此一說 甲有承認權→行使拒絕承認→因此可對丙主張767?
小的認為要1.甲得到法代允許，行使拒絕承認，方可主張767
2.甲之法代(父母)代為拒絕承認，(父母)並對丙主張767
小的認為 有錯嗎!?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.34.18.141
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Examination/M.1440818765.A.783.html
※ 編輯: haha777 (1.34.18.141), 08/29/2015 11:28:55
推
08/29 12:01, , 1F
08/29 12:01, 1F
推
08/29 12:21, , 2F
08/29 12:21, 2F
→
08/29 12:22, , 3F
08/29 12:22, 3F
推
08/29 12:24, , 4F
08/29 12:24, 4F
推
08/29 12:28, , 5F
08/29 12:28, 5F
→
08/29 12:34, , 6F
08/29 12:34, 6F
推
08/29 12:40, , 7F
08/29 12:40, 7F
→
08/29 12:41, , 8F
08/29 12:41, 8F
→
08/29 12:41, , 9F
08/29 12:41, 9F
→
08/29 12:43, , 10F
08/29 12:43, 10F
→
08/29 12:44, , 11F
08/29 12:44, 11F
→
08/29 12:44, , 12F
08/29 12:44, 12F
→
08/29 12:44, , 13F
08/29 12:44, 13F
→
08/29 12:46, , 14F
08/29 12:46, 14F
→
08/29 12:49, , 15F
08/29 12:49, 15F
推
08/29 12:49, , 16F
08/29 12:49, 16F
→
08/29 12:52, , 17F
08/29 12:52, 17F
→
08/29 12:52, , 18F
08/29 12:52, 18F
推
08/29 12:59, , 19F
08/29 12:59, 19F
→
08/29 13:01, , 20F
08/29 13:01, 20F
推
08/29 13:44, , 21F
08/29 13:44, 21F
→
08/29 13:44, , 22F
08/29 13:44, 22F
→
08/29 13:44, , 23F
08/29 13:44, 23F
→
08/29 13:44, , 24F
08/29 13:44, 24F
推
08/29 15:47, , 25F
08/29 15:47, 25F
※ 編輯: haha777 (1.34.18.141), 11/02/2015 14:58:37