[文法] 請問這段落的having had要怎麼解讀？
在原文書中看到這段落，但不清楚為什麼要用as having had the flu
如果是因為要用had表達過去式，那為什麼不直接寫成 Or you "could" be misdiagnosed a
s having the flu.
At this point you might be saying, “Wait a minute! I’m sure that 95 percent of
the people I know have not had mono.” However, you can be exposed to Epstein–
Barr, develop mononucleosis, and simply never show any symptoms. Or you can be m
isdiagnosed as “having had” the flu. But 95 percent of the U.S. population doe
s have the antibodies for Epstein–Barr, which means they were once somehow infe
cted with it. And once you’ve caught the virus, it remains within your body for
the rest of your life, whether you feel sick or not.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 182.155.198.14 (臺灣)
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Eng-Class/M.1703837557.A.794.html
推
12/30 11:44,
4月前
, 1F
12/30 11:44, 1F
→
12/30 11:45,
4月前
, 2F
12/30 11:45, 2F