[單字] given有"因為"的意思?

看板Eng-Class作者 (pardon)時間8年前 (2016/05/06 11:22), 編輯推噓7(7推 0噓 31→)
留言38則, 11人參與, 最新討論串1/1
Well, I'm not really sure you wanna learn about my educational background, given that I was a poor student growing up. 我看中文翻譯，後半段是寫: 因為我從來不是個模範生 所以given有因為的意思? 因為查字典都沒有概念在 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 140.109.244.98 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Eng-Class/M.1462504925.A.DF0.html
→
05/06 11:27, , 1F
google: preposition. "taking into account"
05/06 11:27, 1F
→
05/06 14:09, , 2F
我會翻 有鑒於
05/06 14:09, 2F
推
05/06 19:44, , 3F
中英辭典有時候會被他的中文侷限 用英英辭典比較理想
05/06 19:44, 3F
推
05/06 19:55, , 4F
GIVEN可以想成"給定"嗎
05/06 19:55, 4F
推
05/06 20:06, , 5F
這樣ok嗎 ...background ,because my background is giv
05/06 20:06, 5F
→
05/06 20:06, , 6F
en that I ...
05/06 20:06, 6F
→
05/06 20:07, , 7F
他應該想說他的背景show出來不好看吧
05/06 20:07, 7F
→
05/06 20:07, , 8F
以上純屬猜測0.0
05/06 20:07, 8F
推
05/06 21:37, , 9F
"Given that" is a conjunction. It means "in considerat
05/06 21:37, 9F
→
05/06 21:37, , 10F
ion of the fact that"
05/06 21:37, 10F
推
05/06 23:18, , 11F
就我所知，given that比較像if；now that才像because
05/06 23:18, 11F
→
05/07 00:00, , 12F
vinousred: 談數學的時候 可以
05/07 00:00, 12F
→
05/07 00:03, , 13F
有鑒於稍正式了點(除非透過聲音表情知道是在做效果)
05/07 00:03, 13F
→
05/07 00:05, , 14F
"考量到" 我會這麼講 考量到我過去求學表現並不出色
05/07 00:05, 14F
→
05/07 00:06, , 15F
(而通常想了解別人求學背景應是想找正面突出的表現
05/07 00:06, 15F
→
05/07 00:08, , 16F
吧) 我猜你不會很想知道我那樣的過去吧?
05/07 00:08, 16F
→
05/07 00:13, , 17F
"考量到"算是"因為"的某一種情況 後者更泛用 在這句
05/07 00:13, 17F
→
05/07 00:13, , 18F
裡也更通順 只是字典很難把所有同個單字可能的譯法
05/07 00:13, 18F
→
05/07 00:14, , 19F
都列出來
05/07 00:14, 19F
推
05/07 08:55, , 20F
感覺given that可能性比if高一點,接近"在那前提下"的感覺
05/07 08:55, 20F
→
05/07 13:19, , 21F
畢竟
05/07 13:19, 21F
→
05/07 15:43, , 22F
以下全部節錄自Garner的MAU，At the head of a statement
05/07 15:43, 22F
→
05/07 15:43, , 23F
(most commonly), given is an age-old shorthand way
05/07 15:43, 23F
→
05/07 15:43, , 24F
of saying “assuming as a fact” or “with [the thing
05/07 15:43, 24F
→
05/07 15:43, , 25F
stated] supplied as a basis for reasoning.” If what
05/07 15:43, 25F
→
05/07 15:43, , 26F
follows given is a mere phrase (without a verb),
05/07 15:43, 26F
→
05/07 15:43, , 27F
given appears alone—e.g.: “Given her high position,
05/07 15:43, 27F
→
05/07 15:43, , 28F
she does have opposition.” Larry Whitham, “Episcop-
05/07 15:43, 28F
→
05/07 15:43, , 29F
alians Brace for Divisive Sessions,” Wash. Times, 13
05/07 15:43, 29F
→
05/07 15:43, , 30F
July 1997, at A4. But if a clause follows (with a
05/07 15:43, 30F
→
05/07 15:43, , 31F
verb), a that should accompany given—e.g.: “Given
05/07 15:43, 31F
→
05/07 15:43, , 32F
that he was a medical student at Brown before turning
05/07 15:43, 32F
→
05/07 15:43, , 33F
to professional hockey, Bill McKay might be expected
05/07 15:43, 33F
→
05/07 15:43, , 34F
to be a quick study.” Peter Barrouquere, “McKay
05/07 15:43, 34F
→
05/07 15:43, , 35F
Learns How to Wing It,” Times-Picayune (New Orleans)
05/07 15:43, 35F
→
05/07 15:43, , 36F
, 26 Nov. 1997, at C3. Cf. provided.
05/07 15:43, 36F
→
05/07 16:17, , 37F
所以我沒說錯嘛
05/07 16:17, 37F
推
05/07 17:53, , 38F
經濟系解數學模型都是GIVEN~SOME CONDITION
05/07 17:53, 38F
‣ 更多 posthumous 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1NB0tTtm (Eng-Class)