[文法] being可當動詞?

看板Eng-Class作者 (Elevator)時間10年前 (2016/02/15 22:54), 編輯推噓5(5推 0噓 18→)
留言23則, 6人參與, 最新討論串1/1
出自托福聽力: There are some evidence that being able to talk about that event does lead to having a stronger memory of that event. 為何要寫that being able to talk .... 原本想說是that子句，因此需要一個動詞 不過要用be就好了啊 為何是being -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 140.109.222.73 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Eng-Class/M.1455548093.A.1CC.html
→
02/15 23:20, , 1F
這種that的用法，就當作是某些名詞搭配的慣用句型
02/15 23:20, 1F
推
02/15 23:20, , 2F
that子句的動詞是lead
02/15 23:20, 2F
→
02/15 23:21, , 3F
上面的名詞，在這裡是evidence.
02/15 23:21, 3F
→
02/15 23:22, , 4F
文法要解說的話，就是that引導的名詞子句，作為名詞的同位語
02/15 23:22, 4F
→
02/15 23:23, , 5F
例如： I have heard the news that he won the first prize
02/15 23:23, 5F
→
02/15 23:24, , 6F
另外，你的句子是不是抄寫錯了？應該要寫There "is" some e-
02/15 23:24, 6F
→
02/15 23:27, , 7F
FYI, google "noun clause used as appositive"
02/15 23:27, 7F
→
02/15 23:35, , 8F
the basic structure of the sentence is:
02/15 23:35, 8F
→
02/15 23:36, , 9F
There is some evidence that smoking leads to cancer.
02/15 23:36, 9F
→
02/15 23:37, , 10F
就不用想太多什麼是appositive的東東了
02/15 23:37, 10F
→
02/15 23:56, , 11F
美國人寫的文法書，也不會分析到這樣。都是習慣成自然。
02/15 23:56, 11F
→
02/16 00:39, , 12F
看不懂樓上的解釋...
02/16 00:39, 12F
推
02/16 08:24, , 13F
只是為了要變化 There are some evidences that are 連續兩
02/16 08:24, 13F
→
02/16 08:24, , 14F
個 are 或 is 聽起來怪
02/16 08:24, 14F
推
02/16 10:42, , 15F
推2F
02/16 10:42, 15F
推
02/16 14:07, , 16F
抱歉昨天看一半而已，我錯
02/16 14:07, 16F
→
02/16 19:54, , 17F
我是說原句的結構如同下面這句：(先不管does只是加強表示)
02/16 19:54, 17F
→
02/16 19:54, , 18F
There is some evidence that smoking leads to cancer.
02/16 19:54, 18F
→
02/16 19:55, , 19F
或是用代號寫：
02/16 19:55, 19F
→
02/16 19:55, , 20F
There is some evidence that A leads to B.
02/16 19:55, 20F
→
02/16 19:56, , 21F
A與B是兩個名詞
02/16 19:56, 21F
推
02/16 20:55, , 22F
1.that子句為evidence的同位語2.that子句中的主詞為
02/16 20:55, 22F
→
02/16 20:58, , 23F
being able to...event,does為加強語氣的助動詞
02/16 20:58, 23F
‣ 更多 saucy 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1MmUQz7C (Eng-Class)