[文法] 國高中文法請教

看板Eng-Class作者bi885457 (手工餅乾)時間10年前 (2015/06/17 00:15)推噓4(4推 0噓 3→)

留言7則, 4人參與討論串1/1

The driver argued that the careless pedestrian was to blame for the accident. 翻譯：這位司機堅稱粗心的行人要對這次事故負責。想請教的是，看文法書argued本身帶有義務含義，後接的子句會省略should+原V The driver argued that the careless pedestrian (should) be to blame for the accident. 如果改成上句，不知道是否依然為正確的句子，謝謝。 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 101.13.145.23 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Eng-Class/M.1434471355.A.683.html

推

clumsy5566

06/17 13:15, , 1^F

06/17 13:15, 1^F

→

clumsy5566

06/17 13:15, , 2^F

06/17 13:15, 2^F

推

allenh0728

06/17 14:31, , 3^F

06/17 14:31, 3^F