[文法] 過去進行式與過去式併用問題

看板Eng-Class作者 (那就起而行吧)時間9年前 (2014/09/27 00:13), 編輯推噓3(3推 0噓 19→)
留言22則, 6人參與, 最新討論串1/1
看到一個句子很奇怪 They was winning in 1st inning but we won in 2nd inning. 請問為何前半段用進行式，後半段用過去式? 前半段若用過去式有錯嗎? -- Sent from my Android -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 42.75.84.29 ※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Eng-Class/M.1411748015.A.7D6.html
→
09/27 00:29, , 1F
動詞 was 不搭主詞 they，是原po筆誤還是原句就是如此
09/27 00:29, 1F
推
09/27 00:35, , 2F
were winning領先 won贏了
09/27 00:35, 2F
→
09/27 01:15, , 3F
筆誤。是they were winning
09/27 01:15, 3F
推
09/27 01:34, , 4F
有兩件事情的時候，會用進行式來敘述當作背景的事情
09/27 01:34, 4F
→
09/27 01:35, , 5F
這句子的意思就是「他們領先，一直領先，但我們逆轉了」
09/27 01:35, 5F
→
09/27 04:31, , 6F
"winning"的用法很微妙，因為有兩種稍微不同的意思
09/27 04:31, 6F
→
09/27 04:32, , 7F
win清楚明白只有一個意思，就是遊戲／比賽／戰爭...結束，
09/27 04:32, 7F
→
09/27 04:32, , 8F
你贏了
09/27 04:32, 8F
→
09/27 04:33, , 9F
如果光照著這個意思推廣，be winning就是「正在一直贏」，
09/27 04:33, 9F
→
09/27 04:33, , 10F
或者說「連戰連勝」
09/27 04:33, 10F
→
09/27 04:34, , 11F
例句：This team has been winning all the games since
09/27 04:34, 11F
→
09/27 04:34, , 12F
last month.
09/27 04:34, 12F
→
09/27 04:36, , 13F
但是這句裡面的"winning"是另一個意思，是「持續下去，最後
09/27 04:36, 13F
→
09/27 04:36, , 14F
就會win」的狀態
09/27 04:36, 14F
→
09/27 04:37, , 15F
以球賽而言，當然就是「領先」
09/27 04:37, 15F
→
09/27 04:38, , 16F
但是「領先」不見得是最貼切的翻譯，要看狀況
09/27 04:38, 16F
→
09/27 04:40, , 17F
例如：the candidate wins over the crowd's support
09/27 04:40, 17F
→
09/27 04:40, , 18F
候選人已經獲得大眾支持了
09/27 04:40, 18F
→
09/27 04:41, , 19F
The candidate is winning over the crowd's support
09/27 04:41, 19F
→
09/27 04:42, , 20F
候選人的支持度上升中，但是他不見得是支持度領先的
09/27 04:42, 20F
推
09/27 08:52, , 21F
原來如此 還要看主角及場合才能判斷正確意思 謝謝wo大細
09/27 08:52, 21F
→
09/27 08:52, , 22F
心講解
09/27 08:52, 22F
‣ 更多 artingo 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1K9P2lVM (Eng-Class)