[求譯] 汽車產業的文章
最近在看汽車產業相關的文章，
以下有些不懂的地方想請教大家，
(加" "的句子是我看不懂的，附前後文想說比較詳盡一點)
謝謝版友們:))
1.
Improved labor relationships have structurally benefitted US automakers
改善的勞資關係結構上有利於美國的汽車製造商
One of the most critical structural changes has been the automakers’relationship
with its labor force. Through the UAW negotiations and agreements of 2007 and
2011 and the creation of a two-tiered pay structure, the domestic auto
manufacturers have dramatically reduced their hourly labor costs (GM, for
example, went from an average hourly labor cost of $78 in 2007 to $56 in
2011).
最重要的結構性改革之一為汽車製造商與勞工關係改善
透過2007年及2011年UAW(United Auto Worker,汽車公會)的協商與協議，
創造了一個雙層的支薪結構，
美國的汽車製造商已經大幅降低其勞動成本的時薪
(以GM為例，其勞動成本時薪從2007年的$78降至2011年的$56)
"The Center for Automotive Research forecasts that for every 1% of GM and
Ford’s labor force that is comprised of lower-cost Tier 2 employees, there is a
$0.20-$0.24/hr savings."
根據The Center for Automotive Research的預估...
再下來我就不是很懂了
2.
As the Detroit 3’s cost disadvantage disappears, competition heats up
隨著底特律三大車廠的成本劣勢消失，競爭白熱化
Convergence of product cycles appears to be accelerating at the larger OEMs,
specifically as the Detroit Three have intensified focus on product after
massively rationalizing their cost structures. Historically there was a
tremendous discrepancy between the product cycles of US automakers versus
foreign competitors, but this gap has been largely closed.
"In the upcoming model years it appears that most OEMs should have average
showroom ages within the 2-3 year range with only slight outliers
on either end."
較大型的OEMs產品生命週期的收斂似乎會加快
特別是隨著Detroit Three在合理化成本結構後，專注於產品身上
過去美國汽車製造商與外國競爭者的產品生命週期有極大差異，
但此一差距已經被大大弭平了
在未來幾年大多數的OEMs...
接下來又看不懂了
謝謝大家~
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 60.245.65.181
※ 編輯: monologue62 來自: 60.245.65.181 (07/07 16:34)
→
07/07 21:12, , 1F
07/07 21:12, 1F
→
07/07 21:13, , 2F
07/07 21:13, 2F
→
07/07 21:14, , 3F
07/07 21:14, 3F