[單字] 機器的運作"原理"?

看板Eng-Class作者 (天空藍)時間13年前 (2012/09/16 20:19), 編輯推噓3(3推 0噓 14→)
留言17則, 7人參與, 6年前最新討論串1/1
請問如果要講"學習機器的運作【原理】" 應該要用哪個單字? 我想過theory 和principle 但是感覺都太像"理論"了? 目前想到比較好的講法是how the machine "works" 但是如果想要用learn the "原理" of the machine講法的話 應該用哪個單字比較恰當? -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 111.240.71.81
推
09/16 20:29, , 1F
theory 是擁有一些假設推導出來的結論 (Boundary layer)
09/16 20:29, 1F
推
09/16 20:31, , 2F
principle 就是數學上成立的事情 (Superposition)
09/16 20:31, 2F
→
09/16 20:31, , 3F
theorem 則是經過一連串純粹數學的運算推出來的等式
09/16 20:31, 3F
→
09/16 20:31, , 4F
(Reynolds' Transport)
09/16 20:31, 4F
→
09/16 20:35, , 5F
但是我比較傾向於講 principle of machine
09/16 20:35, 5F
→
09/16 20:36, , 6F
當然前面推文的分的比較仔細啦~ 但principle用法廣了點~
09/16 20:36, 6F
→
09/16 22:48, , 7F
I'd like to study the mechanism of a laser printer.
09/16 22:48, 7F
→
09/16 22:49, , 8F
I want to learn the concepts of polymerase chain reaction
09/16 22:49, 8F
→
09/17 03:00, , 9F
如果你覺得中文代換成機制也通的話 可用mechanism
09/17 03:00, 9F
→
09/18 08:47, , 10F
mechanism+1
09/18 08:47, 10F
→
09/18 09:57, , 11F
推 mechanism 這個比較好!!^^
09/18 09:57, 11F
推
09/18 23:28, , 12F
Mechanism or working principle
09/18 23:28, 12F
→
08/06 07:43, , 13F
當然前面推文的分的比較 https://noxiv.com
08/06 07:43, 13F
→
09/07 00:04, , 14F
m
09/07 00:04, 14F
→
09/07 00:04, , 15F
09/07 00:04, 15F
→
12/02 18:22, , 16F
當然前面推文的分的比較 https://muxiv.com
12/02 18:22, 16F
→
04/13 22:39, 6年前 , 17F
如果你覺得中文代換成機 http://yaxiv.com
04/13 22:39, 17F
‣ 更多 loveazure 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1GLSFlWa (Eng-Class)