[請益] 請大大幫忙分析此文(槍是否能有效自衛?)

看板Eng-Class作者 (我可能不曾愛妳)時間14年前 (2011/12/19 01:25), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串1/1
這一段給了幾個數據 我看了好幾次還是搞不太清楚 麻煩大大幫忙分析 Two pieces of information available in the NCVS support this view. First, victims who used guns were substantially more likely than victims in general or victims using other self-protection measures to face offenders armed with guns - 32.7 percent of victims who attacked the offender with a gun, and 21.8 percent of those who threatened the offender with a gun, and 21.8 percent of those who threatened the offender with a gun, faced offenders with guns, compared to only 6.8 percent of all victims who used self-protection measures, and 2.2 percent of all victims. Second, victims who used guns were more likely to face multiple offenders - 33.2 percent of victims who attacked offenders with a gun and 34.5 percent of those who threatened with a gun confronted multiple adversaries, compared to 20.6 percent of all those who used self-protection measures, and 6.2 percent of all victims. These findings are consistent with the view that crime circumstances likely to appear more dangerous to victims are more likely to push victims into using guns. They are contrary to the speculation that crime outcomes are better for gun-wielding victims merely because other circumstances of the crime made successful outcomes more likely." 所以第一份資料顯示,受害者使用槍枝抵抗有槍的歹徒的人數是比那些沒有使用 槍枝而改用其他工具防禦的受害者數目來的多 32.7%的受害者會攻擊使用槍的違法者 21.8%的受害者會使用槍 6.8%的受害者採取其他措施 2.2%的受害者?(看不懂) 第二份資料顯示,有槍的受害者比較有可能遇到多種的違法者 33.2%會攻擊使用槍的違法者 34.5%會遇到多種敵人 20.6%採取其他措施 6.2? 一整個迷惑..... -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 115.83.1.115
文章代碼(AID): #1ExY8ZMJ (Eng-Class)