[資訊] cleft sentence
Taking I am tired as the base sentence, the four cleft versions which are
possible are:
It is I who am tired. (Nominative, number, person)
It is I who is tired. (Nominative, number)
It is me who am tired. (Objective, number, person)
It is me who is tired. (Objective, number)
_____________
With You are tired, you singular. (Cases conflated.)
It is you who are tired. (Nom/Obj, number, person)
It is you who is tired. (Nom/Obj, number)
_____________
With You are tired, you plural, only one version is possible. (Cases
conflated and number and person conflated)
It is you who are tired. (Nom/Obj, number/person)
_____________
Two versions are possible with each of the remaining pronouns. (Number and
person conflated)
It is [he / she] who is tired. (Nominative, number)
It is [him / her] who is tired. (Objective, number)
It is [we / they] who are tired. (Nominative, number)
It is [us / them] who are tired. (Objective, number)
_____________
My understanding, right or wrong, is that the most formal and academic usage
requires the It is I who am pattern, i.e., nominative case and both number
and person agreement. Some people argue that I who is is fine. I don't
think anyone argues in favor of me who am. My impression is that,
informally in conversation, me who is might be used.
Following the idea that the maximum of agreement is needed for formal,
academic use, ... you who are ... is the version to use, whether you is
singular or plural. Likewise, ... [he / she / we / they] who [is / is / are
/ are]... are the more formal forms.
____________
http://www.englishforums.com/English/ItsYouWhoIsAreAnsweringMe/dcwdz/post.htm
--
若家中有裝設中華電信MOD，只要打開第203台，就可以24小時看到
基督教「新眼光電視台」的節目！
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 163.30.191.250
推
08/09 02:04, , 1F
08/09 02:04, 1F
→
08/09 02:06, , 2F
08/09 02:06, 2F
→
08/09 02:09, , 3F
08/09 02:09, 3F
→
08/09 02:11, , 4F
08/09 02:11, 4F
→
08/09 02:11, , 5F
08/09 02:11, 5F
→
08/09 02:13, , 6F
08/09 02:13, 6F
→
08/09 02:15, , 7F
08/09 02:15, 7F
→
08/09 02:17, , 8F
08/09 02:17, 8F
推
08/09 02:21, , 9F
08/09 02:21, 9F
→
08/09 02:21, , 10F
08/09 02:21, 10F